When someone trespasses on
your property and tampers with its contents, what’s the first thing you
want to do? What’s the first thing that comes to mind? Train a ferocious dog to
rip them apart? Rig up some type of booby trap like that kid did in Home Alone? Hire your own security guard
to search the premises and stand at the door like a bouncer?
Okay – maybe you want to take
a lighter and less expensive route and do what the NYPD advises. Install some
surveillance cameras to capture the crooks’ images and if you can get an alarm
for your home, that might work, too. Police say doing simple things like
locking your windows and doors will help keep intruders out, too.
I’ve received plenty of calls
at the office from homeowners who were robbed while they were inside their
house. It’s frightening to know that anyone can just enter your comfort zone at
any time and rob you blind. That’s why people should also set their home alarm
systems when they go to sleep – we’re most vulnerable when we’re asleep and
not paying attention to what’s going on.
It’s ironic that the city
puts out all of these advisories for residents to “protect their homes” and
properties when the city can’t even protect its own property! In early October,
Federal legislation was proposed to “toughen” penalties for those trespassing
high-profile structures. That’ll scare away those kids and “activists” who were
able to climb to the top of the Brooklyn Bridge! That’ll show those hooligans
who somehow gained access to the top of the World Trade's Freedom Tower!
I don't care about security “oversights” and lack of resources. What if, in one of those instances, the perpetrators made it to the top of the structure and planted a bomb? What if those scoundrels were able to place cameras where they intruded and plot an attack? What if they were carrying weapons and were able to obliterate vehicles or passersby?
Ok – maybe you want a lighter
and less invasive excuse for why they climbed some of the city’s most
vulnerable high-profile structures. They just wanted to “make a statement” and
make the news! They didn’t hurt anyone!
In an ideal, post-9/11 world,
we wouldn’t need to make excuses for why our government isn’t protecting us
from trespassers. Do you realize how easy it is to access a public structure
and potentially plan something dangerous?
Sure, now they’re taking measures to put “new barriers” in place…once the
damage has been done. That’s like waiting until your gorgeous house gets
ransacked by a pack of thieves before you finally decide to dish out money for
an alarm system.
Why are we waiting for
someone to trespass on a high-profile building or structure to implement a
stronger safety or prevention plan? What have they been doing all of these
years? The more you hear about these incidents on the news, the more an average
New Yorker will realize how the government really isn’t prepared to protected
us.
Out of the security breaches
that were reportedly “prevented” already, where do those handful of dangerous
incidents fall in the “prevention” category? If it happened before, what makes
anyone think it won’t happen again?
Plenty of “safety measures”
can be put into effect. Deterring offenders through “tougher fines” doesn’t
really address the issue – that we’re vulnerable and unprepared because no one
is physically preventing trespassers from getting to their destination.
Let’s get real…Who was
patrolling the Brooklyn Bridge when someone stuck a white flag at the top? If
this act was committed in the dead of night, when no one was around – what does
that say about limited the hours during which we’re protected? Shouldn’t the
grounds of the Brooklyn Bridge be protected 24/7?
Oh, well…Isn’t it good to
know that the government can’t afford around-the-clock protection for our most
vulnerable landmarks? How can we prevent trespassers in the first place if
access points are so easy? Which landmark or high-profile structure will be
next?
If you ask me, the
government’s been sleeping for way too long. Maybe it will take another catastrophe and another breach of security for Senator
Chuck Schumer and other lawmakers to start practicing their open-mouthed Home Alone expressions.
Unpublished 10-20-14
No comments:
Post a Comment