Monday, March 30, 2015

A Life Lost: When Spending On Surveillance Doesn’t Pay


If I had the resources, the time – and maybe an intern’s detailed assistance – I would investigate how many arrests were made in Canarsie last year thanks to surveillance camera footage. How many unsolved crimes exist despite footage capturing someone in the act? To be specific, how many crimes in New York City Housing were thwarted, altogether, by the presence of cameras?

A year ago, a young man shown on camera walking through Bayview Houses was apprehended for a rash of robberies shortly after his image was released. Maybe the arrest was a result of the new technology installed at the housing development. Maybe it was thanks to quick-acting residents who recognized the thug while he was walking the grounds.

Really…how much are cameras really worth much when you realize they might not prevent a crime from occurring. Yes, criminals may be deterred from committing an act if they know they’re on camera, but they could easily conceal their identity and get away with murder – literally – should they feel the need to commit one.

Unless there’s a security guard behind the scenes, watching live video feed, who will act promptly before the suspect flees the scene, too many tragedies will occur with only a video camera in place.

It’s good to hear that 29 New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) developments in the city will be getting security cameras by the end of this year. Last week’s news of upgrades and additional installations will probably be well received by NYCHA tenants – but how effective will cameras be when it truly comes to crime prevention? What about inside buildings, elevators, hallways and areas where cameras won’t reach?

In my opinion, it won’t be enough to spend millions upon million of dollars (NYCHA and city officials are reportedly providing $17 million) on installing cameras in city buildings, as per Mayor Bill de Blasio’s announcement last year.

Let’s get real! When the media publishes the headline and story: “Shooter/stabber/robber caught on camera,” the horrific act has already been committed. A life has already been lost, changed or impacted…A wallet or phone has already been stolen and an attack has already traumatized the victim!

We’ve seen plenty of camera footage on the news where a gunman opened fire in the middle of the street, outside of a club or house party. It’s great that we have those images of the reckless punks, but in many unfortunate cases, police were unable to respond fast enough to catch up with the suspects – who already left multiple people with wounds that perhaps scarred them for life – or cost them their lives!

Chances are, arrests are made in those club and party house shootings as a result of someone coming forward with information. However, it’s satisfying knowing that justice will eventually be served and that a criminal will do time as a result of being positively identified via technology.

When it comes to scum-of-the-earth nutcases like Daniel St. Hubert, who brutally stabbed two innocent children in an elevator in the Boulevard Houses in 2014, justice can’t come soon enough even though he was arrested within a few days of the stabbings. Would it have mattered if a camera were installed in those buildings while he was committing the heartless crime?

Even if he knew he was on camera, I don’t think he was in a sensible, normal frame of mind to realize what he was doing in the first place. Reports stated that St. Hubert went back and forth with authorities on whether he was mentally fit to even stand trial! Please…A “normal functioning” person does NOT take a knife to two defenseless children! In this case, I don’t think all the cameras in the world – worth thousands of taxpayers’ dollars – would have saved those innocent kids.

It seems like most criminals aren’t banking on getting arrested or being identified – or most of them wouldn’t be committing the crime in the first place. I know that’s a naïve way of thinking, but can we assume that a lot of criminals are somehow “mentally unfit,” which results in them making irrational decisions to commit crimes? Cameras stand no chance – anywhere, not just in NYCHA buildings – when it comes to ruthless scoundrels and their violent tactics.

In my opinion, we need more HUMAN presence instead of machines and technology to simply observe a crime going down. Unfortunately, there’s not enough money in the world to hire enough manpower to patrol NYCHA to catch criminals and repeat offenders. Preventing shootings will NEVER happen!

Let’s see if the millions of dollars spent on installing cameras will spare the lives of thousands of victims who are waiting to be shot, stabbed, robbed and attacked. Instead, we’ll be looking at blurry and dark images of someone running from a crime scene.

When crime decreases in buildings that already have cameras, we might have a chance to capture the moment – and the crook – before it’s too late.

No comments:

Post a Comment